This is the kind of stuff that makes my blood boil. It’s one thing to question somebody’s character when they have done something wrong, but for a Christian to attack another Christian because he is not “Christian enough” is absolutely unacceptable.
Focus on the Family founder James Dobson appeared to throw cold water on a possible presidential bid by former Sen. Fred Thompson while praising former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who is also weighing a presidential run, in a phone interview Tuesday.
“Everyone knows he’s conservative and has come out strongly for the things that the pro-family movement stands for,” Dobson said of Thompson. “[But] I don’t think he’s a Christian; at least that’s my impression,” Dobson added, saying that such an impression would make it difficult for Thompson to connect with the Republican Party’s conservative Christian base and win the GOP nomination.
Mark Corallo, a spokesman for Thompson, took issue with Dobson’s characterization of the former Tennessee senator. “Thompson is indeed a Christian,” he said. “He was baptized into the Church of Christ.”
In a follow-up phone conversation, Focus on the Family spokesman Gary Schneeberger stood by Dobson’s claim. He said that, while Dobson didn’t believe Thompson to be a member of a non-Christian faith, Dobson nevertheless “has never known Thompson to be a committed Christian—someone who talks openly about his faith.”
You see, this is the issue I have with people like James Dobson and Gary Schneeberger. Why does someone have to “talk openly about his faith” to be a committed Christian? You can be a Christian and not evangelize 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
I have met many, many, people throughout my life. A few of them were total schmucks, but most of them were very decent people. None of them were perfect, and many of them were not what Mr. Dobson considers “committed”, but they were fantastic people and wonderful Christians none-the-less. I’ve probably met more committed Christians in my life than I think I have, because you see, you don’t need to wear Christianity on your sleeve for people to know whether or not you’re a committed Christian. The best way to share your faith is by the way you conduct your life.
While I fully understand the importance of religious issues in today’s world, especially in politics, how much should you have to talk about your religion before it constitutes being “open” enough to be considered “committed”?
Think about it.
How many times each day do we hear the President, any President in fact, reference God, or Jesus? How many of our Presidents quote Scripture during a televised news conference? How many of our Presidents have held fireside Bible chats? If we don’t count the references to God in their official speeches and “God Bless America” at the end of every speech, exactly when have our Presidents been “open” about their Christianity? Seriously…
“We use that word—Christian—to refer to people who are evangelical Christians,” Schneeberger added. “Dr. Dobson wasn’t expressing a personal opinion about his reaction to a Thompson candidacy; he was trying to ‘read the tea leaves’ about such a possibility.”
They imply that the only committed Christians are evangelical Christians? And they’re reading the tea leaves?
James Dobson, a self-described “committed” Christian, was trying to read tea leaves where Fred Thompson’s candidacy is conserned? Are they kidding? Should a “committed” Christian really be using a ‘tea leaves’ metaphor in his attempt to negate the legitimacy of another persons Christian faith?
Sphere: Related Content